Running Head: Globalization- Moving Forward or Moving Backwards?

With 35 million tribe, Tokyo stops the dirty money for being the solid grounds largest city. Second place goes to Bombay with 22. 2 million sight and New Delhi follows that with 20. 9 million (McKinnon, 444). It is no question that the creation is home for billions of concourse and the number is exploitation. The world today is precise incompatible from what it was years ago. Through freshly technologies, we argon commensurate to communicate with batch in a matter of seconds. The profit connects people to do calling internationally and quick. It has reduced the impostal problems you get with trading.It is now very patrician to guile goods and service around the world. Beca persona of this, commercializes atomic number 18 much open and aspiration is giantger. Investment has changed with on simple eye banking. It digests people to move their money internationally. globalisation is a accomplish where global connections fetch thicker and it creates relationship s between more(prenominal) people in ample distances. Globalization is a organization where people atomic number 18nt in their get along little villages any more than yet they be brought together by trade or diplomatic relations. Globalization represents a change in world organization thither be both positive and detrimental effect of globalization.As our world with new technologies begin to march forward, many countries be being left-hand(a)field behind. For employment, economic reforms clear transformed India into the second alacritous growing largest economy. According to India Rich vs. Poor, they mentioned Indias economic growth rate in the year 2007 to 2008 is 9. 1% compared to the linked States growth rate in 2007 to 2008 is 2. 2%. Indias economic growth rate is supposed to be as yet higher in the next few years. It is one of the fastest growing economies in the world. The Indian rupee has even gr consume stronger than the fall in States one dollar bill (Roskins, 467).With all this said, India seems like its on track to be a commanding world power. However, India suffers from high levels of illiteracy, malnutrition, and sexual urge in comparability. India has more distressing people than the chaste of Africa. We reserve al directions lived in a world that has created hierarchies. We nonplus blue and woeful, affluent and less affluent, developed and developing, and third world countries. Whatever system we use, the gap between teeming and unworthy im decompose be very distinct. According to a report in the New York Times, technology and Internet access pass on intensify the difference between rich and shortsighted countries (Miller).This gap has always sum upd over the years because it is a byproduct of globalization. In 2005, military personnel Bank estimates that 1. 1 billion people in the world lived in extreme leanness. The definition of extreme want would be poverty that kills and that people who live under ex treme poverty whitethorn live off of a dollar a day. More than 8 million people die each year because of poverty. numerous quantify its from preventable diseases. For sheath, approximately 3 million people in Africa die of malaria each year. This situation in Africa has worsened over the lowest two decades.Forbes magazine has published that there are 358 billionaires in the world. Their unite net worth goes past tense the combined net worth of the worlds poorest 2 and a half billion people. Globalization goes all the way back to beginning. When people built roads it made the world so a great deal smaller, but at the akin time easier. Wheels and boats led to changes in transportation. valet walked first, then came horses and carriages, after that the invention of bikes came along and soon after that was the automobile. soon traveling did non take days and months, but in a couple of hours you could get from point A to point B.Another example would be writing with ink to pr inting books all of these mentioned were a capacious milestone for the human race. From the inventions of these things, more people were able to learn more things ab discover the world. We are no longer stuck in villages, knowing the resembling people and same traditions. Today, globalization continues with the Internet. Now we burn down get culture in a matter of seconds. People everywhere are connecting by dint of social networking sites, blogs and video sites. We are able to proscribedsource jobs. Outsourcing is when you take a job and handing it to a third party. eachthing from clothes to technological jobs are acquire taken overseas in the United States. many another(prenominal) companies use outsourcing to shine the cost of toil (O Neil). Education ties into outsourcing because it is different in other countries. Many jobs move over to India because the educated middle class in India has a significantly better mathematical training than students in the United States. From 2000 to 2015, an estimated 3 million American jobs volition have been outsourced. A kid make out a Wii in the middle of America calls a help line in India for troubleshooting on his Wii.We are now getting nestled and closer to each other even if we live thousands of miles by. The causes of poverty in the worlds poorest nations may be complicated. Causes range from where the bucolic is located, diseases, civil war, and congenital disasters. It may be things we take for granted such as a lack of clean water, lack of education, or lack of an effective wellness care system. Many poor nations have corrupt governments as well. nigh problems may date back to colonialism, farm subsidies, cultural and historical dry lands, or problems with institutions such as initiation Bank.A lot of times the reason why many countries are in deep poverty is because of colonialism. What happens is that westerly nations stepped in and stole the riches of their colonies. By doing this, the w estern countries gained money, and left the agricultural they invaded with nothing else. Dependent instruction is when a less developed country relies on a modernize country. They act as equal partners but some nations could impose unequal exchanges on others and weaken the economic development so they could make their development stronger or more advanced.Dependent development impacts organization in developing nations because they could mess with their system so they could rattling get ahead (ONeil). An example would be Latin America. After WWII, radicals conceit of the dependency theory, which said that the less developed countries is dependent economically in the capital, products and policies of the First World. If they could get out of control of US corporations, they could eliminate poverty. westbound countries have taken gold from Peru, rubber from Brazil, tea from India, and cocoa from western hemisphere Africa.Many times, countries shind to get out of rule from th e countries that took over. When they left, the Western country left them with many problems that the new country could not get out of easily. An example could be India. When the British left them, India has faced challenges such as phantasmal violence, discrimination against certain types of castes, terrorism, and regional separatist insurgencies (Roskins, 449). virtually may order the blame on farm subsidies and other trade barriers. Farm subsidies have the effect of transferring income from the general taxpayers to the farm owners.The worlds wealthiest nations give more than 300 billion dollars of subsidies to their farmers every year (McKinnon, 446). By doing this, it makes it difficult for poor farmers to contend with the big Western farmers because in some cases, the subsidy goes to the big industrialized farms. However, if you get rid of these subsidies, it may not help out poor farmers either. If there are industrialized farms in developing nations, poor people who would have worked in the small farms wouldnt be able to work in the bigger farms because they would be replaced with machinery.So the poor people would move to cities where they may not set about jobs. Another factor may be cultural or historical. Some reasons why Arab nations are poor may be because they are not advanced economically in modern times. Arab nations may be behind because of the way they treat their people. Many Arab nations look tweak on free speech, they dont have good case education, and there is a shortage of womens rights. For example, having gender equalities in a country reduces economic growth. By having gender inequalities, it resolutions in a wide gap between the opposite sexes.There are still 65 million Arab adults who are illiterate, and two thirds of them are women (Friedman). In India, women also suffer from high mortality rates. An example could be that their healthcare favors boys. Boys ordinarily get more access to food and medicine and they get it be fore girls. Girls dont get first priority and this results in many children, a lot of them girls, getting sick and dying from malnutrition (Hopkins). The World Trade judicature, International Money Fund, and World Bank are usually the most criticized when it comes to the issue of globalization.Some people suppose that big stage business are looking out for themselves only and expand the world grocery stores for their own interests. Some of the policies of the World Bank have ruined the development of Third World countries rather than help it. The World Bank contains high interest rates, which harm some companies. Their trade liberalization made some countries poorer and unable to compete with the global market. Also, the liberalization of capital markets drove smaller banks out of business. non all-financial aid given to poor people doesnt actually go directly to the people.The World Trade Organization is typically the target of anti globalization protests. People against glob alization reckon that the World Trade Organization neglects labor and human rights, only serves the interests of big corporations, increases inequality, and undermines national independence (McKinnon, 447). Some people may say that globalization pull up stakes create a monopoly for countries that dominate in businesses. Because of the unequal relationships some countries go away be left behind and the ones ahead will dominate the world economy. Another negative is the outsourcing of jobs.It lowers standards and weakens regulations in order to keep or attract business. Everything will verify on each other and when the dominant country falls apart so will the whole globe. Some may argue that as globalization increases, the world population has a wider gap between rich and poor. Globalization will create a greater chance for countries to have crises and problems. It will affect everyone because everything is so close knit compared to before. Some people who support anti globalizati on believe that globalization will land old institutions, traditions, and cultures.Individuality and collective identity are giving way as globalization proceeds. As developing countries learn Western influence, they will throw out what used to mean a lot to them, and accept someone elses cultures. As societies trade their own cultures institutions for a plebeian global society, what used to be shaped by values and tradition will now be shaped by materialism and consumption. The things that make the society different such as the language, music, food, history, values and norms will be taken, maybe changed, and will be sold around the world.Things (such as products) that did not make the cut, will be taken and forgotten because new things that were more appealing to people around the world will come in and take over. An article titled McWorld by Benjamin Barber explains the struggle of globalization and corporate control versus Jihad, which is tradition and traditional values. Bar ber believed that there were four imperatives to McWorld. They are A market imperative, a pick imperative, an information-technology imperative, and an bionomic imperative. The market imperative says that all national economies are vulnerable of larger, transnational markets.In these markets, there are free trades, the currency is convertible, and access to banking is open. The resource imperative is when countries will use each others resources. After all, everyone needs something that they dont have. Every nation has something and some nations dont have anything that they need. The information technology imperative says that technology will connect everyone. Business, banking and commerce depend on information current and you do these now through technologies. The ecological imperative is when nations ruin innate resources for things that they need.We all depend on each other, so if you tear down a rainforest to get resources, another country may use those resources. This ecolog ical consciousness has meant for greater awareness but to inequality because the nations that are modernized may not want to use their resources to help the nations that are not modernized. Barber concludes that traditional cultures or big corporations support democracy. (ONeil) The precondition McWorld may come from McDonalds, which is the fast food chain that gets criticized a lot. McDonalds has undetermined franchises in over 100 different countries.The symbol is recognized near everywhere you go from a small town in the United States to a city in China, you will be able to find a McDonalds almost anywhere you travel. It is controversial when it comes to globalization becomes it associates itself with deforestation, harvesting of animals, and a promotion of junk food. Many people believe that McDonalds is destructive towards many cultures that it has been introduced to. McDonalds gets criticized for destroying the practice of a home cooked meal and many countries, especially t he United States, are dealing with problems such as obesity in adults and children (ONeil).Since McDonalds is everywhere, it has become the model of getting rid of individuality. Some critics against globalization believe that it will overwhelm people with countless choices, ideas, values, and information that may be sound for some cultures to understand. As we move closer and closer together, everything seems to rely on each other. If our world truly globalizes, the struggle of freedom and equality will shift from domestic to international. Globalization may lead to greater negate and chaos. On the other hand, economic globalization also applies to labor.Globalization can help people move and want to migrate. International economic connections, goods and services are expanding people want to move where the money is. Countries get to get out what they produce best and throw away things that arent as popular. transnational corporations take advantage of new markets and new opportu nities. As a result wealth is to be diffused effectively through open markets for goods, labor and capital. Globalization is supposed to take people out of poverty and allow everyone to be a part of the global marketplace for goods and labor.If you look at it this way, globalization is seen to be positive because you bring billions of people out of poverty and produce affluence by letting more people be part of the global marketplace. As globalization has increased over the past quarter century, the percentage of the worlds population that has lives in poverty has declined. Peoples life expectancy has risen, especially in part of the world that globalization is a big deal such as China and India, compared with the countries that are not so globalized, such as Africa (ONeil). Globalization has opened up bigger communications.It has introduced companies into countries, and has helped many people get out of poverty. Globalization has pop the questiond opportunities for the workingman and also women. Many women work now because of globalization, and it was able to provide them with pay where they can support their families. Globalization can promote equality for people. Globalization forces businesses to compete on a bigger scale and the market becomes bigger. The competition is greater and will give consumers more choices. I believe globalization is not always a good thing.I believe that globalization will create monopolies for some companies. I dont think it will be fair when it comes to competition. It will give people more choices, but I dont think the quality of goods that we get will be of the best quality. The currency isnt the same throughout the whole world, so the money that is distributed to some people will be different , because of this I think equality will be harder to reach because some people in countries that are more modernized will be getting paid a lot more than countries that are behind.I think it will eliminate small businesses in the Unite d States and it will be hard for small business owners to compete in the global market. Globalization will eliminate individuality in many things such as goods. I think many cultures will forget their own traditions as well, as they welcome in new ideas. As for the whole world, I think that globalization will increase dependence on other countries. All the countries will rely on each other. If someones market crashes, especially from a commanding world paper such as the United States, everyone elses market will crash.I feel that as our world becomes more advanced, we are consumed in a materialistic way of thinking and its almost as if we are moving backwards rather than moving forwards. We value things that are so obsolete such as materials like diamond rings. It seems to effectuate a price tag on people and in this sensation we are almost tribal. I believe globalization will truly take over. Our world is getting smaller and smaller everyday. What we do here, in the United States , definitely will affect other people elsewhere.