Ethics and Abortion Essay

Nicky was 18 when she started date with James. They had unprotected premarital sex. After a few weeks, she found out that she was fraught(p) so she asked an advice from her doctor. She wasnt ready for a baby yet. She still had her ambitions in look and she didnt want to give up her social intent. So she and James obdurate to abort the baby (Real conduct Abortion (Nickys Story), 2003). Yes, you read it right.In this sequence of one-night stands, premarital sex and outcast pregnancies, miscarriage has become a park resort from responsibility. Abortion is the removal of an fertilized egg or a POC (Product of Conception) from the uterus. Basically, there are cardinal casefuls of spontaneous abortion the spontaneous abortion and the induced abortion. Spontaneous abortion is the type that is caused by accident and/or by natural cases. It can besides be caused by environmental f cloakors. On the opposite hand, induced abortion is caused by piece numeralion.It is furth er categorized into remediation and elective. therapeutic abortion is the act of removing the fetus from the uterus for reasons of safety and/or survival in the part of the fuss, to preserve the mothers health, to terminate pregnancy that would result in a child born with inbred disorders, and to selectively reduce the number of fetuses to diminish health risks regarding multiple pregnancies. Meanwhile, elective abortion is the kind of abortion performed for any other reason. at that place are two different exactly parallel theories regarding abortionthe important system and the deontology theory. The consequential theory believes that an act is morally right if and only if it contri only ifes to the common good(Williams, 1973. ). It outrightly supports abortionmay it be therapeutic or elective. In therapeutic abortion, if the mother life is at risk in having the pregnancy, then the consequential theory allows for such action. If having a baby destroys a souls future car eer, then abortion is okay.Consequential theory denies that moral goodness depends solely on the anything other than the consequences (B. Hooker, 2000). Nonetheless, what makes this morally wrong is non the abortion itself nevertheless the consequences it may bring to the mother such as ablaze trauma. Consequential theory ignores all morally relevant factors to the consequences as opposed to whatever the circumstances there may be(Mill, 1861). However, deontology theory asserts otherwise.Deontological ethics or duty-based ethics does not consider an act as good or fiendish per se but classifies the action as it is being performed or on the do by of performing devoid of prejudice or pre-established ethical principles. It judges morality by evaluating the record of the actions and the will of the person mingled rather than what is achieved(Kay, 1997). It is also known as nonconsequentialism. Deontological judgment depends on the object or original nature of the act. It typical ly involves two important elements, prerogatives and constraints.Prerogatives deny that one should unendingly choose the option with optimistic consequences and constraints lieu limitations on the actions that the person may do in order to bring around his own personal good. Thus, from the deontological parlance, abortion, because it takes away life, upsets natures way of creation, and denies the natural qualification of a cleaning lady to give birth, is objectively and intentionally malicious, although it could be justified in extreme cases which would merit for an exception.These two theories, in essence are different but somehow, they are compatible with from each one other. They do not really contradict each other, rather, they are analogous. Analogous theories are truly and essentially different but necessarily contradictory with each other in principle but they could catch analogous effects or conclusion per occupation that is why they are analogouspartially the same , partly different. In the present society, most women view abortion consequentially.They justify abortion by consequences it may cause. Lets take Nickys situation as an example. Nicky believes that the abortion of their baby is right in the first place because it was not yet the right time for them to have a baby. If she were to continue with her pregnancy, what would have happened? She would have lived a miserable lifenot having a job or a career and tied cut down with a baby. What if her boyfriend James leftfield her? Could she find another man who would quick accept her despite her past?There were lots of things to be consideredschool, financial stability, and emotional stability. These and a lot more questions ran through with(predicate) Nickys mind before she firm to go with the abortion. Obviously, it is not easy to get wind to confuse ones conscience. still if we look at it closely, it is a subject area of rights. Womens rights. Everybody makes mistakes. Nicky did a mistake by engaging in unprotected knowledgeable intercourse with her boyfriend. Nevertheless, continuing the pregnancy could also be a mistake.Abortion, when we look at its consequences, is not a mistake. According to the Womens Rights, women have the right to bodily impartiality and autonomy. Whether or not the woman decides to resort to abortion of the fetus deep down her body, it is her right to decide on that. off from that, women also have the right to parenthood and marriage. Women who have committed abortion should not be discriminated by the society. True, it is not such a nice image but hey, women are humans. Women have rightsequal rightsand dignity(2006, valet Rights Watch).